Tuesday, February 2

Hypocritical Self-Righteous Outrage

Usually I stick to my own hypocritical self-righteous outrage, but this time, I'm taking on others'.

Recently, I've seen people blather on about how they could NEVER put their child in a t-shirt that suggests they're something other than perfect and sweet. No, no funny shirts for them. Those are "offensive" and, to some, make them "sad for the child" and assume the parents are "immature."

These shirts are the types that they're talking about...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

And yeah, I get it. I like seeing these shirts...on other kids. I think they're funny...for other people. I wouldn't put them on my daughter, but I don't think simply putting them on a child and taking a picture constitutes a reason for outrage or a holier-than-thou judgement for this reason alone.

These people can be fantastic parents but have a dark or sick sense of humor. You think it makes you a better parent to slather your kid in things that say "Princess" or "Heartbreaker"? Those messages are unapologetically egotistical and entitled. And given that you are willing to label your child with such arrogance, does that make you more mature than someone who is willing to find humor in the obviously tongue-in-cheek super-imposition of adult penis size jokes on a baby who doesn't have the same stigma?

Let's put this in perspective.

Clothes are not permanent. For the most part, people throw their kids in these clothes for the sake of a picture and move on. Usually, it doesn't become fodder for Christmas cards or family newsletters.

By contrast, piercing your baby's ears is permanent body mutilation for the sake of adornment. Tattooing a baby is illegal, if you pierced a nipple or a nose that would be as well. I don't think ears should be any different. You are altering their body for the sake of a look you like.

And how about some of you that name your children RIDICULOUS things? I mean, I'm all for a unique name, but...there's being original and then there's being an asshole.

I recently heard of a couple who named their child Lucky. (Everyone make your own jokes.) Based on the name alone, he obviously is not. Worse yet, if it had been a girl, they were going to name her Camper. You want to talk about permanent damage, a lack of foresight, and subjecting your child to something unnecessary?...and you're worried about a t-shirt.

I like to think that, like me and my husband, my daughter will not be perfect but she will like herself and have a sense of humor. And by the time she'd be able to understand a joke in a picture, she'd also have no doubt in her mind that it was just a joke and find humor in it as well. I mean, she will have been brought up by us, afterall.

You know, I wish people would spend their time, energy, and judgement on things that actually MATTER. But instead, some would rather throw on the halo, grab the megaphone, and seek out those they disagree with.

In the meantime, their child with the name derived from their favorite type of cheese is taking antibiotics so she doesn't get infected after the elective surgical procedure her parents just subjected her to so she gets to look prettier for when they voluntarily hand her to the bearded stranger in the mall dressed in the Santa suit.

Makes perfect sense to me.

19 comments:

High Priestess Kang said...

I love your point about the bizarre names.

Yeah. Yeah. Everyone is a critic but you're spot on about the difference between a funny onesie and ear piercing (that was already considered a right of passage in our house).

Sometimes, I think people look for utterly inconsequential things to complain about. A well-nourished kid, who is thriving and happy, with parents who have an obscure sense of humour is not one of those things (to complain about).

Besides - how are funny onesies any worse than our wardrobes from the 80s? :taps hands: Perspective, people! Perspective!!!

OK - hawt Dr Drew is back.

Melissa said...

OT- I'm surprised at how few comments you get given how many readers you have! Like this post- I'd expect a bunch of people commenting, and then to sit back and enjoy you reasoning them into a corner :). Oh well, I guess I'll have to resort to the boards for that!

Samantha said...

Me too! I'm always amazed at how many people tell me they read the blog.

Well, I'm guessing people don't want to come in swinging on my blog, but I really wish they would! I know things I say won't be universally accepted-- I'm always up for a good conversation.

Or, hell... I wouldn't even mind a troll here and there. It comes with the territory.

Jessica said...

You are always so spot-on with your insights,in my opinion. The boards have gotten so tiresome with the holier-than-thou, critical attitudes! Keep up the great works!

Monkey2679 said...

I also have to agree with your blog - who cares about a stupid onesie? I've stopped going to the boards for the most part because I'm sick of seeing people criticize others for what they do. No one is perfect and for people on there to constantly put others down, it wasn't worth my time. (Plus, I got addicted to Facebook instead!)

Samantha said...

Monkey, don't let the boards chase you away! Swing back! It feels good afterwards. LOL

VP said...

Ok, so I have never commented here before because I couldn't remember my Google account info... Any way, I am on of those ladies you may be referring to...
I love shirts that have sayings, my husband probably has some of the MOST offensive shirts you have seen... But, I do find it creepy to put my son in a shirt that refers to his genitalia... I will put him in one that says "Boob man", "Bitch give me the milk" etc.
I just don't like anything that could possibly help some perv get off... It probably stems from my being molested as a child and working for an abused children center. I don't know - I just can't get over any jokes about sex with kids or genitalia references...

Samantha said...

Punkin, totally agree on the sex with kids one. And, I can understand why you might not like the genitalia ones.

Which does your husband have? Pics!

Nicole said...

Stricly out of curiosity and in no way am I asking to start drama.

Do you take the same stance on circumcision as you do with ear piercing? Circumcision also being something parents elect to do to, but it isn't exactly necessary. I won't say they do it to make it "look cute" because well male genitalia isn't exactly cute. =]

I'm Neeecole on the boards, but I'd rather ask here for fear of the backlash.

Samantha said...

Nicole-- good question! I wondered about that as I was writing it because this is probably an area that I could apply a bit of the "hypocrite" label to myself.

If I had had a boy, I would've circumsized. Now, I would've done this for two reasons: 1) Because of the hygeine issue (which is arguable, I know) but I have decided is valid. 2) I had friends a while back who were not circumsized and complained a lot about phimosis (Google) which sounded extremely painful but was fairly common.

So, while the reason I would've done it wouldn't have been for looks necessarily, I will say that I do think looks would be a bonus!

Nicole said...

I did google phimosis...ew.

Now, to out myself. I did have my daughter's ears pierced and if I ever have a son, I'll have him circumsized. Yes, they do look cute but it's not the sole reason I had them done. My major reason was a hygiene issue, not as severe as circumcision, I suppose. I felt that there was less of a chance of infection if she wasn't able to play with her ears all the time. There is a slim chance that she'll wish I hadn't done it, but she could always take them out. Now, if a boy decides one day he would have rather had his foreskin, he's SOL. Will I still have him circumsized? yep.

VP said...

Hmm, let me see if I can think of some of his shirts...

"Take 7 -up Yours"
"Mount & dew me"
"Don't stop till the panties drop"
"Lord of the Cockrings"
"My weiner is bigger than yours" (two stick-figures roasting hot-dogs)

(I am sensing a theme here...)

There are so many, I'll have to look through them when I get home. To see what I am missing...

Actually, going back and re-reading the shirts I have listed... A person that doesn't know my husband may assume he is compensating for something... lol

Samantha said...

Punkin, he wears those shirts for himself or for your kid?

Samantha said...

Nicole, I don't hatecha but I think the ear piercing hygeine issue is a small one, of course. I wouldn't even put the extra dabs of a cotton swab in the same category as digging out pus from an infected uncircumsized willy.

...I just grossed myself out there...

But, again-- to each their own! I really don't begrudge anyone doing it as long as they're going to be self-aware before they lash at others for doing lesser things.

Nicole said...

I believe I'll survive that mental image..

I was just trying to emphasize that although I made the choice to have them pierced, it wasn't just because I wanted them to look cute. I totally understand why you wouldn't wan to have them done, but I appreciate that you embrace the "to each their own" policy. It's too bad more people don't on the boards.

VP said...

He wears the shirts strictly for his own amusement and the "shock" factor. I think he likes to see the look on other people's faces when we walk into places.

-> The thought of cleaning pus out of anything makes me sick. reading about cleaning pus out of a willy made me vomit in my mouth... That's just nasty...

Samantha said...

Vomit in your mouth-- that reminds me... I had even written this down last night.

The Paris Hilton of Trenton said...

I was one of those who "felt sad for the child". That being said. I don't mind funny onesies in any way. I just don't like those that are vulgar. That's all.
Also, I refuse to buy my child anything that says "princess" or refer to her as one. I agree that it creates a sense of entitlement.
I don't have a holier than thou attitude. I just hate seeing babies dressed in clothing with offensive language and references to any genitalia. If that's someone's cup of tea, get a key chain.

Samantha said...

OK Paris-- I've gotta ask (you practically baited me to do so!): how do you tell what is "offensive"? The Supreme Court couldn't figure it out, but what's your definition?